ReaperCloud

DNSSEC

DNSSEC signs a domain’s DNS answers so a resolver can tell a real answer from a forged one. We check the chain from the registry down — and whether it is signed with algorithms the rest of the internet still accepts.

Status Signed and secure
Algorithm ECDSAP256SHA256 (13)
DS at parent 63608 / SHA-256 (2)
Denial of existence NSEC3, 0 iterations
Signatures valid to 2026-11-08

Looking good

DS records at the parent

Published by the registry. Each must name a key the zone publishes, by key tag, algorithm and digest.

Key tagAlgorithmDigestMatches
63608 ECDSAP256SHA256 (13) SHA-256 (2)
e6a8a3179dae9bebb2e1dea43ba5fec67ee01efbe62e2e9c255ea2e42194fe99
key 63608, digest verified

DNSKEY records

The zone’s public keys. The key-signing key (KSK) signs the key set and is what the DS points at; zone-signing keys (ZSK) sign everything else.

RoleKey tagAlgorithmSizeIANA guidance
KSK · trusted by DS 63608 ECDSAP256SHA256 (13) 256-bit RECOMMENDED
ZSK 25915 ECDSAP256SHA256 (13) 256-bit RECOMMENDED

Signatures checked

CoversSigned byAlgorithmValid fromValid until (UTC)
DNSKEY 63608 ECDSAP256SHA256 (13) 2026-10-25 21:32 2026-11-08 23:02
SOA 25915 ECDSAP256SHA256 (13) 2026-10-26 13:11 2026-11-09 14:41

Checked through 93.95.224.28, a validating resolver.

HOW TO READ THIS

What each part is for

Two halves, two places

The keys and signatures live with your DNS host. The DS record — a fingerprint of your key — lives at the registry, put there by your registrar. Both halves have to agree. Changing DNS host without updating the DS is the most common way a signed domain disappears.

Broken is worse than unsigned

An unsigned domain resolves everywhere; it just cannot prove its answers are genuine. A domain with a DS that does not match its keys fails to resolve at every validating resolver — Google, Cloudflare, Quad9 and most ISPs. That is why a mismatch is an error here and not signing at all is not.

Which algorithm

The IANA registry, the canonical source since RFC 9904, recommends ECDSAP256SHA256 (13) and ED25519 (15) for signing, with RSASHA256 (8) still recommended. RFC 9905 (2025) moved the SHA-1 algorithms (5 and 7) to MUST NOT. Changing algorithm is a key rollover your DNS host handles.

NSEC3 settings

RFC 9276 says NSEC3 must use zero extra iterations and should not use a salt — the recommended parameters are 1 0 0 -. Higher counts cost every resolver CPU without hiding names, and validators may treat them as insecure.

DNSSEC is also what makes DANE possible: a TLSA record in an unsigned zone protects nothing.